Teresa Jeffs strikes back, questions Malonis’ judgment and lifestyle
Brooke Adams reports two interesting tidbits on the days’ events in San Angelo. First, Teresa Jeffs’ defense attorney, Alan Futrell, filed a motion to replace Natalie Malonis.
I haven’t see the motion yet, but Adams reports that the Jeffs motion calls into question Malonis’ “personal behavior” — going all the way back to Malonis’ 2000 divorce that ended in Malonis’ husband getting full custody of their two sons — saying that the behavior reflects “choices that brought her [Malonis'] judgment, lifestyle and her ability to cope with responsibilities and obligations into question.”
Interesting stuff. Anyone with more information — facts only please — about Natalie Malonis is encouraged to chime in either in the comments below or privately to kurt@iperceive.net.
We’ve already questioned Malonis judgment and her willingness or ability to cope with her responsibilities and obligations to Teresa Jeffs. Nice to see Jeffs’ attorney has recognized the problem, too. Would be nicer to see him flat out allege that Malonis’ behavior has jeopardized Jeffs’ case in civil and criminal arenas.
Also of interest . . .
. . . this intriguing coda to Adams’ article:
“A Tom Green County District Court clerk said on Monday the judge has still not authorized the public release of the [CASA report]” that was leaked by someone (Malonis?) last Friday. Until now, I had assumed that the CASA report was initially approved for release. Adams’ statement here suggests that the report has never been approved for release.
If it never was approved for release, someone in the CPS-CASA cabal (note that CPS agent Angie Voss in on the Board of the Tom Greene County CASA that wrote the report) very illegaly publicized highly sensitive, prejudicial material. This is not, however, to say that the publication would be legal with court approval. Nothing Judge Walther decides should be accepted at face value.
19 comments
Kurt, I have been wondering about something for a while. The first pictures of Warren Jeffs kissing the girl and the anniversary/reception photos were stamped by a court clerk and entered into evidence with a number. Isn’t it a crime to release evidence to the public before a jury has been selected? This business of trying a case in the media feels like a pretty tackey thing to do if not outright illegal. What do you think?
I have this image of Malonis confessing her sins to Teresa as if to a priest. Then Teresa gags and is repulsed by the world of filth outside her heaven on earth. If I were a movie director I would be salivating at the opportunity to dramatize this scene. I am sure those all night talks grossed Teresa out. Can’t you just see it?
I too feel concerned about the legality of allowing the public to view evidence before the jury and to release all this information to the press before it is ever tried. It seems that it makes it illegitimate evidence. Sad to say, it seems like a lot of things in this case are illegal.
Natalie Malonis is certainly abusing her clients rights because she is not representing her as she would like her too. It is not often that attorneys go against their clients’ wishes. It is an interesting fact to note that there is a great misunderstanding between attorney ad litem and gaurdian ad litem. The gaurdian ad litem is the one who is supposed to do what is in the best interest of the child. Attorney ad litem is supposed do what the child wants whether or not he/she thinks it is in the childs best interest. Interesting isn’t it?
These folks are completely forgetting what happened to
Mike N-I-F-O-N-G!!!!
Their behavior smacks of the same illegal, unethical, and unprofessional behavior that left Mr. NIFONG broke, disbarred, unemployed, and spending 1 day in jail (he really deserves the 30+ years he tried to railroad his innocent victims into serving).
Word to the wise folks. Word to the wise.
To be “MALONISED” in the family court/CPS system is the synonymous with being NIFONGED in the criminal court system.
Both are cut from the same despicable, unethical, criminal cloth.
I can only hope and pray that Ms. Malonis serves time like Nifong did–only more. I hope and pray she ends up disbarred and disgraced for her hateful, unprofessional, unethical behavior towards Ms Jeffs and her family.
I hope her chickens come home to roost–so0ner than later.
Natalie Malonis’ name will end up right next to Mike Nifong’s in the dictionary. She’d be wise to stop pushing while she’s only slightly behind. Of course, she’s every bit as blindly ambitious as Nifong was and can’t see for herself she’s going WAY too far with her illegal behavior.
The release of the photos came after a custody hearing. This would be juvenile or family court. Under the Family Code in Texas, Chaper 102 “Filing Suit”
Ҥ 102.0086. CONFIDENTIALITY OF PLEADINGS. (a) This section applies only in a county with a population of 3.4 million or more.
“(b) Except as otherwise provided by law, all pleadings and other documents filed with the court in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship are confidential, are excepted from required public disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code, and may not be released to a person who is not a party to the suit until after the date of service of citation or the 31st day after the date of filing the suit, whichever date is sooner.”
That’s the only item regarding confidentiality of records that I could find, but only doing a quick search ( at http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/fa.toc.htm)
There’s more — far more than most want to read — on this confidentiality topic in Natalie Malonis on Cheapshot Against Client. Doesn’t answer all of the questions, but it starts the discussion.
I’d rather all pleadings be public record absent any sealed for a specific reason fully addressed in a motion requesting such, and a strict time limit on hearing it (if opposed).
One exception should always cases involving juveniles, unless the counsel representing that juvenile requests that all are public.
I do not like secret court cases, hidden from the public.
********
********
Now, back on the topic, natalie malonis!
Facts only you say?
Then I won’t say anything about her hair.
When I saw that “full custody” went to the husband, I recalled seeing her business web page , where it states:
“Natalie lives in the Fort Worth area with her two teenage sons.”
Either she made up with the boys and the father somehow, or it just sounds good to add it there (they spent the night?).
Somebody should look into 2000 divorce records in Denton, Collin, Tarrant or Dallas County, where she lives and practices. Maybe Texas has open records on it. There should at least be scheduling on the case open so her ex’s name could be found.
Imagine her as a mommy?
********
********
As for “never approved for release”, that is difficult if Langford has it BEFORE the court clerk’s office does.
I’d have to see a stamp on it AND have “Vicki Vines, a clerk with the Tom Green County District Court Clerk’s office,” explain why she did know it was there when Langford called her about it.
On that “Langford called about” the “report” topic, it’s looking more like Langford had it lonnnng before the court clerk and was told by the person[s] that gave it to her to hold off publishing on it UNTIL she had confirmed that the court clerk had it.
The trouble may have been in the clerk’s office. Langford published it FRIDAY at 4:40 PM, and the clerk was heading home for the weekend soon.
Who could she then call to confirm it? Evidently didn’t want to share the name of the CASA representative that actually filed it.
She was down to the wire for the weekend starting and out of sources, so Natalie had to be the confirmation source.
Paints Natalie into the corner on showing who she is in complete cooperation with, the CPS / CASA/ walther’s crowd. Of course we all knew that, but then…
Monday early we see the motion to seal all that critical information Natalie doesn’t want the public to see!
What happened to your Natalie Malonis shocker article? Did she threaten to sue?
For more [allegations] on Ms. Malonis’s lifestyle and judgement, one should view court documents filed in the Tarrant County District Clerk’s Office in the case of Natalie Bush Malonis vs. John Adam Malonis, Cause Number 324-263643-98, which is a matter of public record.
[redacted]
NIce hack job, Frimble. That’s OK…the truth is out there in cyberspace….and in the Tarrant County courthouse. Ms. Malonis has been exposed as the drug-addled fraud she always was. Hacking Kurt’s web page won’t do a darned thing to change that.
See court documents filed in the Tarrant County District Clerk’s Office in the case of Natalie Bush Malonis vs. John Adam Malonis, Cause Number 324-263643-98, which is a matter of public record.
The TRUTH shall set the FLDS free….and put Ms. Malonis behind bars where she belongs!!!
Woo-hoo.
Natalie’s law firm Elsey & Elsey has false information about Natalie’s experience on its website. They claim Natalie Has “extensive” experience in family law and she most certainly does not.
Records show that Natalie quit practicing law back in the early 1990’s and did not start practicing again until 2005. In fact, pubic records show that in May of 2005, the Tarrant County Judge handling Natalie’s custody battle with her ex-husband removed Natalie’s right to have any overnight access to her children AND in the same document ordered her to GET A JOB. Take a look media - it’s all there just as Jeny said.
Three years ago Natalie Malonis was a strung out substance abuser with extensive mental health issues who had not practiced law for years and who had no right to overnight custody of her children. She has a personal history withTexas CPS and those records are also there for anyone to see.
WAKE UP WALTHER!! Natalie Malonis must be removed from this case entirely and immediately.
Elsey and Elsey published these lies about Natalie on their website and a grievance should be filed when lawyers and law firms misrepresent an attorney’s background.
The website claims:
Ms. Natalie Malonis has extensive expertise in Family Law, Asset Protection and Estate Planning and Probate. Within Family Law, Natalie specializes in complex, high-conflict custody litigation, as well as issues such as domestic violence, substance abuse and parental relocation. In the areas of Estate Planning and Asset Protection, Natalie provides clients with a range of planning options designed to protect assets from creditors, minimize tax liability, and provide security for clients’ spouses, children and grandchildren. Natalie has a particular focus with planning and drafting complex Trusts and Family Limited Partnerships for our clients with estate assets in excess of two million dollars. Natalie has extensive trial experience in Denton County, Collin County, Tarrant County and Dallas County.
Natalie: I know you read this site, so here is a challenge to you: Exactly how many high-conflict custody cases have you handled? For that matter Natalie, how many family law cases have you been lead counsel on in your entire career? Did you know that it is a violation of the State Bar of Texas rules for you to claim that you specialize in family law when you are NOT CERTIFIED BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION. You are a train wreck and an emabarassment to the legal profession.
Natalie Malonis failed to learn the lessons of Mike Nifong.
I predict: She is going to go down in a blaze of scorn and derision just like he did. She will lose her law license and, I suspect, she will do time for her unethical behavior that violates her oath of office as an attorney.
Like Mike Nifong, she is so addicted to all the attention, she can’t see how much trouble she REALLY is in!!!
Jeny,
You will never give up, will you. If anyone here knew your background they might laff themselves to death
Jeny,
I don’t know your background but I agree with Vic.
You need to give up.
Glory, Glory, Gloria — I will be praying for you.
ROFLMAO….I can tell you I have *never* been found an unfit parent. I have never lost custody of my children to anyone. I have never purposely lied in order to steal children from their families and parents. I have never drugged my children to “knock them out”. I have never made them sleep on the floor with dog feces and urine. I have never done any of the disgusting things the illustrious Natalie Malonis has [allegedly] done. And never will either.
[In my opinion], she and Mike Nifong—two of a kind. [redacted]
Mark my words.
Hi Jeny
Tell Gloria hello for me
Luv them tar heels
btw Jen have you ever impersonated one of your children? lol
Leave a Comment