Report on Harry Reid’s anti-FLDS Senate hearing

by Kurt Schulzke on July 24, 2008

Missing from today’s Senate Judiciary Hearing, “Crimes Associated with Polygamy,” was the one thing that would have made it credible and useful: balance. No one at the hearing spoke up for the accused.  And not a single Senator attempted to cross-examine any witness.  The disregard for fairness was shocking.

Our constitutional system of due process requires that governing agencies — from the Congress to the County Commission to County courts — allow all parties to a regulatory process the opportunity to be heard. Harry Reid, like Judge Barbara Walther in San Angelo, saw to it today in Washington that only one side of this FLDS controversy had that opportunity.

Refusing to allow willing FLDS witnesses to speak was a spiteful, dishonest trick by Harry Reid. The result is that the country has been denied a fair examination of the questions before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

I watched all but the first 30 minutes of the hearing. There was moving testimony by the anti-FLDS crowd. If what they said is true, then Warren Jeffs is a creep and criminal, every bit as evil as Judge Barbara Walther. But because neither the FLDS as a group nor Warren Jeffs, individually, was given air time, we can’t say we’ve learned anything about anyone involved. There were points but no counterpoints.

Orrin Hatch was insufferably smarmy, doing his level best to look out for the Mormon Church (by asking silly questions intended to create brand distance between LDS from FLDS) when, as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hatch should have been guarding due process and constitutional rights. The Constitution was clearly not his first priority today. Despite (or maybe because of) his transparent efforts at creating religious distance, I think Hatch and the FLDS witnesses came perilously close to painting the LDS and FLDS with the same brush.

The immaculately coiffed and whiney Texas AG made it clear — despite proforma verbiage to the contrary — that his agenda is to rid Texas of polygamy and the FLDS religion. The Arizona AG begged for more federal money and DOJ involvement.

One bright spot was the testimony of the U.S. Attorney for Utah, Brett Tolman, who advised Congress to (a) honor the constitutional line of probable cause, and (b) stand down and get out of the way because more high-profile federal “help” will only exacerbate whatever real legal ills exist in the polygamist communities.

Nobody listened. They were all swooning over Carolyn Jessop and Dr. Fischer and congratulating themselves on polarizing the public debate. Don’t get me wrong: Their stories are moving. If what they say is true — and that is a big if — someone should do something. But no one should do anything — like Texas CPS and Judge Barbara Walther — that violates the Constitution of the United States.

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

Karateka 07.24.08 at 1:03 pm

Hopefully this will lead to perjury convictions for the three profiteers.

Jeny 07.24.08 at 2:14 pm

http://www.rightalk.com/rightalk.asx
Kurt is on the air right now (3:00 pm Eastern 7/24/08)

Jeny 07.24.08 at 2:51 pm

Don’t forget to mention Natalie Malonis’s horrible personal background!!!

Namely, court documents filed in the Tarrant County District Clerk’s Office in the case of Natalie Bush Malonis vs. John Adam Malonis, Cause Number 324-263643-98, all of which is a matter of public record.
In those documents, Ms. Malonis is revealed to be a child abusing, lieing, deceitful, drug addled and violent fraud. Something she’s always been, but nobody has acknowledged publicly up to this point.

She is unfit to be around ANYONE’s children….even her own.

Her ex-husband and his current wife have an order of protection against Natalie due to a violent domestic abuse attack by Natalie on Mrs. (Jamie) Malonis while Jamie Malonis was heavily pregnant. Fortunately, Mrs. (Jamie) Malonis’ unborn was not seriously injured in the attack.

Natalie Malonis UNFIT to represent a chihuahua, much less a human child.

FREE THE FLDS…….FREE Teresa Jeffs.

kbp 07.24.08 at 6:20 pm

“…to be heard

…like Judge Barbara [w]alther in San Angelo, saw to it… only one side of this FLDS controversy had that opportunity.”

The problem absent attention.

Tic Toc Tic Toc

Nothing for walther to worry about, it will go away when all but the true victims find something better to focus their attention on.

It’s getting quieter each day, as the deafening silence grows stronger.

Toes 07.24.08 at 6:45 pm

Is the radio discussion available through an archive?

karen 07.24.08 at 8:07 pm

As a member of the LDS church (not FLDS) I feel a need to apologize for the performances of two purported LDS senators, Orrin Hatch and Harry Reid. Neither is a credit to our faith. We have personal experiences with both of these men, and do not respect either of them. Many LDS members would gladly see both of them out of the senate. Romney IS a credit to his faith, but these two are, frankly, jerks.

Doran Williams 07.24.08 at 10:26 pm

Kurt, I cannot find the links to the transcripts of the hearings in Judge Walther’s court in April. I thought I had downloaded the material, but can’t find that either. Can you help me out? Thanks

Doran Williams 07.24.08 at 10:44 pm

Kurt, I am having an Emily Latilla moment. Never mind, I found them in your June Archives. Thanks for posting them and keeping them.

Kurt Schulzke 07.24.08 at 11:16 pm

coconuts 07.25.08 at 4:59 pm

If we’re serious about protecting innocents, what about a hearing re: Crimes Associated with PORNOGRAPHY? Surely that casts a much wider net than going after a few rogue polygamists? Or is it so much harder to bully larger numbers that it’s not worth the effort to do real good?

little IF 07.25.08 at 10:38 pm

“If what they said is true, then Warren Jeffs is a creep and criminal…”

On that same vein:

If what they said is true, then Joseph Smith is a creep and criminal…

If what they said is true, then our Lord and Savior is a creep and criminal…

But what they said was not true. It was lies.

“If what they say is true — and that is a big if — someone should do something.”

There is no “if” about it, Kurt. What they say is not true, but they have already done something:

1. They have persecuted and crucified the Savior.
2. They have persecuted and shot Joseph Smith.
3. They have persecuted andunjustly imprisoned Warren Jeffs, and would like nothing better than to shoot or crucify him, too.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>