Obama’s Ethnic Bomb
Close on the heels of the news about Mousa Abu Marzook, yet another problem publication from Obama’s pastor stares us in the face. With each new revelation, we may be lulled into a false sense of security, thinking we’ve heard this story before — that this is just a replay of the same information. It isn’t. These are new revelations tying Barack Obama to extremist Islam, with disturbing consistency. Like an artichoke, as layers are stripped away the heart comes into view.
Hypothetically speaking, we may wonder at the visit to North Africa, to Moammar Gaddafi, by Farrakhan and Obama’s infamous minister of twenty years. As I observed before, they did not stop by for tea. A hint of the probably-nefarious purpose of that visit is suggested in the following by Michael Goldfarb:
How close is Obama’s church, and his former Pastor of 20 years, to Minister Farrakhan? Well, just months before Oprah endorsed Obama, the Church saw fit to publish an open letter by Ali Baghdadi, Farrakhan’s Middle East adviser, to America’s richest woman in advance of her trip to Israel with Elie Wiesel:
‘I must tell you that Israel was the closest ally to the White Supremacists of South Africa. In fact, South Africa allowed Israel to test its nuclear weapons in the ocean off South Africa. The Israelis were given a blank check: they could test whenever they desired and did not even have to ask permission. Both worked on an ethnic bomb that kills Arabs and blacks.
‘Arabs have always supported the dismantling of this racist government. In 1962, African-Arab Sudan granted Mandela a passport to travel with to gain international support in his struggle to free his people. Libya, among other Arab states, provided Mandela and other African liberation movements, political as well as material support . . . .’
The important part of the above quote is not the absurd nonsense about the ethnic bomb, although the double entendre should be obvious. If Libya and other Arab states provided Mandela and other African liberation movements with “material support”, there is no reason under the sun that we should expect otherwise with Reverend Wright’s American Black Liberation Theology, which by Wright’s own definition, is a shamelessly African movement. It is reasonable to conclude that Farrakhan was taking Rev. Wright to meet his financier for black revolution. It is all spelled out in Jeremiah Wright’s real bibles, written by James Cone and Dwight Hopkins. It is their books, not those by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John that Wright vigorously promotes.
In addition to his outrageous sermons, Wright has published at least two of these anti-Semitic, anti-white, anti-American diatribes, from different Middle Easterners. Farrakhan endorsed Obama. Wright endorsed Obama. As have a number of others whose endorsement should be an embarrassment to the candidate. It appears indicted Chicago bag man, Frank Rezko, funneled funds to Obama — by way of the now-notorious purchase of Obama’s home — as soon as Obama arrived in the United States Senate. Rezko is also linked to Nahdmi Auchi who has been linked, in turn, to Saddam Hussein. Given the links, the weak denials, and the long history of these problem relationships, to pretend it impossible or unthinkable that loot from Islamic terrorists are not finding their way to Obama or to his campaign is naive and dangerous.
As discovery after discovery about Jeremiah Wright’s “Christian” church surfaces, it becomes painfully apparent we are seeing only the tip of an iceberg. What is represented to blinkered, comfortable white America as a Christian church has every appearance of a political movement with long tentacles stretching from Chicago across the Atlantic and beyond. While we watch Superbowls, have breast implants, or any of a dozen other vain and frivolous things, the rug is being pulled out from under our civilization. Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi continues to hobble America’s anti-terror effort by stonewalling the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. While we fiddle, Rome burns.
8 comments
This is eerily like the plot of a Shakespeare play. There appears to be major, major treachery afoot. Where are those who have sworn to defend the Constitution? Ironically, Obama is one of those. Why in hades don’t they do something about this? What are we paying them for?
Now we have good old Jeremiah referring to Italians as “garlic noses.” ??? This is a minister of Christianity? Well, ya gotta love him. He is shooting Barack down, and we should bless his name even if he doesn’t bless anyone else’s.
What does it take to get Americans to take this seriously? It isn’t just a campaign for the US presidency. It is a campaign — from the Black Liberation Theology standpoint, for control of the country. And we have Louis Farrakhan telling it like he sees it, telling “white folks, you owe us the whole d____ country.” And he intends to collect.
I don’t always make a comment because I agree with your posts but please know that you are read daily and enjoyed and that also goes for Margot’s posts. Did you happen to see the home that was built for the Rev by his church? I think we are all in the wrong business. And he has the nerve to rail against rich (oh ya, he included white) people. I guess that leaves half of him out. Anyway, FOX had a segment on it. The financing is way too complicated for me to understand.
Prompted by Bambi’s post, I checked out the Rev’s house. $1.6 mil worth, paid for supposedly by his church. ? It’s his “reitrement” home. Plus, if I read it right, a $10,000,ooo line of credit for the Rev. To do what, plant tulips? Or donate in turn to political campaigns?
And who donated the $10 mil to the church? It may all be innocent, but I smell money laundering, a la Rezko/Auchi and maybe Farrakhan, he of the Trumpeter Award and his and the Rev’s mutual friend, Libbyan terrorist Qaddafi.
Does anyone wonder why he has risen so fast? Who really is supporting him?
I appreciate your post above, J.M. Brown, and it seems really, really suspect to me too. Even though all the pundits were
saying it’s perfectly legal.
There is a web site that also questions his Christianity, as I do.
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12745.htm
Please check it out and see what you think. It still is beyond me why any Jewish person would vote for him.
Legal and moral are often diametrically opposed. If we were able to probe under the skin of that $10 M, I expect it would be crawling with maggots.
The congregation the Rev represents are theoretically poor blacks (in contrast the “rich whites” he rails certainly against.) Even with 8,000 congregants, there is some pret-ty heavy donating going on to come up with $11,600,000 to retire a pastor.
Does anyone suspect that the $10 M is hush money from Auchi and friends? Hushing up the Rev. has to be a highhhh priority for many of his connections, here and abroad. Obama has to be just one of a number who would like his lip zipped.
Legal and moral are often diametrically opposed. If we were able to probe under the skin of that $10 M, I expect it would be crawling with maggots.
The congregation the Rev represents are theoretically poor blacks (in contrast the “rich whites” he rails against.) Even with 8,000 congregants, there is some pret-ty heavy donating going on to come up with $11,600,000 to retire a pastor.
Does anyone suspect that the $10 M is hush money from Auchi and friends? Hushing up the Rev. has to be a highhhh priority for many of his connections, here and abroad. Obama has to be just one of a number who would like his lip zipped.
Leave a Comment