ABA write-up on Texas CPS debacle: “My mother’s not too young, so why am I here?”

by Horatius on October 27, 2008

The ABA Journal’s October edition has an interesting write-up on the FLDS case.  Gary Banks, by the way, declined to be interviewed. Excerpts:

In a massive clash between church and state, a band of Texas lawyers learns that individual stories still count . . .

When Susan L. Hays took an at­tor­ney ad litem assignment for one of the many Texas custody cases of the Funda­mentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, she never imagined her client would be 2 years old.

Hays’ client is 2 years old. The mother is related by marriage to Merrill Jessop, now believed to be in charge of the Eldorado compound. Hays has spent much time talking to the child’s mother. “That was helpful to me because I learned a lot about how she thinks and it made me comfortable with her as a mother, no matter what weirdness goes on with the FLDS,” Hays says.

In June, Hays said she was confident her client’s moth­er was a good parent, but she didn’t know what informa­tion the government had about the child’s stepfather. He was later indicted and charged with bigamy and sexual as­­sault related to his alleged marriage with a teenager. Despite the stepfather’s arrest, Hays’ client was nonsuited in September, as were many other FLDS children. Hays says she’s happy with the court’s decision and will stay in touch with the family.

Full text at ABA Journal. ht: DH (not that kind of DH!)

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

rikitikitavi1 October 27, 2008 at 7:00 pm

Kurt, what is most enlightening in that article is Hays’ comment about the age at which MOST ad litems consider their clients to be old enough to form the attorney-client relationship & be able to direct the attorney. FOUR YEARS OLD!! How old is Teresa Jeffs?

old young one October 27, 2008 at 8:26 pm

Rikitikitavi: the next question is: How old is Natalie? Should she be out here by herself? Does her mother know where she is?
Truth be known, FLDS mothers have a clue.
I don’t see how Natalie could, given her track record of swapping sides through this whole ordeal.
JMO, take it or leave it ;)

rikitikitavi1 October 27, 2008 at 8:51 pm

There’s lots I could say, but Natalie is low-hanging fruit. It’s only a matter of months until her client can tell her to pound sand (hopefully with a lawsuit for malpractice & restraining order).

old young one October 27, 2008 at 10:08 pm

I’m ready. Where’s the popcorn?

Me October 27, 2008 at 10:31 pm

A toast for CPS, Judge Barbie, and the rest of the Texas Mobocrats:

“Here’s wishing they were in the middle of the sea in a stone canoe with iron paddles and that a shark swallowed the canoe and the Devil swallowed the shark and himself locked up in the northwest corner of Hell, the key lost and a blind man hunting it.”— JS

old young one October 28, 2008 at 12:08 am

AMEN.

charlesh October 28, 2008 at 1:42 am

Ditto

kbp October 28, 2008 at 9:59 am

The public record of Natalie’s life, even if you discount the majority of it, leaves me under the impression she has not been able to make decisions for herself or her own children that are always sound.

That ABA article got a few good points across.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: